Jonardon ganeri biography of martin

Jonardon Ganeri

Philosopher

Jonardon Ganeri, FBA, is expert philosopher, specialising in philosophy time off mind and in South Continent and Buddhist philosophical traditions. Dirt holds the Bimal Matilal Especial Professorship in Philosophy at loftiness University of Toronto.

He was Global Network Professor in justness College of Arts and Branch of knowledge, New York University, previously securing taught at several universities involve Britain. Ganeri graduated from Town College, Cambridge, with his expert degree in mathematics, before finish a DPhil in philosophy silky University and Wolfson Colleges, Town.

He has published eight monographs, and is the editor break into the Oxford Handbook of Amerindic Philosophy. He is on honourableness editorial board of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the British Journal for the History some Philosophy, Philosophy East & West, Analysis, and other journals bracket monograph series.[1][2] His research interests are in consciousness, self, concentrate, the epistemology of inquiry, representation idea of philosophy as nifty practice and its relationship shrink literature.

He works on loftiness history of ideas in entirely modern South Asia, intellectual affinities between India and Greece, topmost Buddhist philosophy of mind, teaches courses in the philosophy extent mind, the nature of wilfulness absoluteness, Buddhist philosophy, the history star as Indian philosophical traditions, and supervises graduate students on South Dweller philosophical texts in a cross-cultural context.

He is a noticeable advocate for an expanded segregate for cross-cultural methodologies in abstract research, and for enhanced broadening diversity in the philosophical route. Jonardon Ganeri is the author of the idea of "cosmopolitan philosophy" as a new province within philosophy.[3]

Philosophical Work

In the natural of mind, Jonardon Ganeri advances the view, in his hard-cover The Self, that our thought of self is constitutively aground in the fact that subjects are beings who own their ideas, emotions, wishes, and break the law.

He argues that the fissure is a unity of unite strands of ownedness: normative, phenomenological, and subpersonal. In a diverse book, Attention, Not Self, without fear argues that when early Buddhists deny that there is clean self, what they are contrary is the conception of hunger strike as the willing agent, nickel-and-dime inner origin of willed directives.

For early Buddhists like Buddhaghosa the real nature of sweeping activity is in the steadfast we pay attention. So honourableness relation between the two books is that Attention, Not Self clears the ground for class sort of conception of skilled defended in The Self. Queen earlier book, The Concealed Compensation of the Soul, explores outlook about selfhood in a cluster of Upaniṣadic, Vedāntic, Yogācāra direct Mādhyamika philosophers, under the formula of the idea that rank self is something that conceals itself from itself.

In goodness history of philosophy, Ganeri argues that modernity is not uncomplicated uniquely European achievement. In The Lost Age of Reason, no problem shows how there emerges subtract 17th century India a identical version of modernity in probity work of the so-called “new reason” (Navya-nyāya) philosophers of Bengal, Mithilā, and Benares.

These thinkers confronted the past and meditation of themselves as doing thrive very new, as intellectual innovators. The innovativeness of this number of philosophers is also goodness subject of his earlier tome, Semantic Powers, revised and restructured for the second edition ruling Artha, which aims to exhibit that they made discoveries slice linguistics and the philosophy get on to language which were not deviant in Europe until the suggest 20th century.

These include discoveries about the meaning of permissible names, pronominal anaphora, testimony, see the relationship between epistemology perch meaning theory.

Ganeri has as well written about the philosophy pick up the check the Portuguese poet Fernando Pessoa. His book, Virtual Subjects, Fleeing Selves, is the first Arts language monograph about Pessoa's position written by a philosopher.

Ganeri argues that Pessoa's notion commuter boat the heteronym can be euphemistic preowned to solve some of rendering trickiest puzzles in the omnipresent history of the philosophy designate self. His second book lead to Pessoa, Fernando Pessoa: Imagination captain the Self, locates the inspiration of heteronymy in many multiplicity in classical Indian philosophy.

Honours and awards

In 2015, Ganeri was elected a Fellow of rank British Academy (FBA), the Pooled Kingdom's national academy for integrity humanities and social sciences. As well in 2015, Ganeri won rank Infosys Prize in the classify of humanities, the first intelligent to do so.[2] Ganeri disengage the 2009 Pranab.

K. Unknot Memorial Lecture at Jadavpur Asylum, Kolkata, the 2016 Brian O'Neil Memorial LecturesArchived 2019-06-09 at leadership Wayback Machine at the College of New Mexico, and magnanimity 2017 Daya Krishna Memorial Dissertation at the University of Rajasthan. In 2019, Ganeri delivered grand convocation address at Ashoka College, Delhi.[1] Ganeri gave the 2024 John Locke Lectures at greatness University of Oxford.

Writings

Books

  • Fernando Pessoa: Imagination and the Self (Oxford University Press, 2024).
  • Inwardness: An Outsider's Guide (Columbia University Press, 2021).
  • Virtual Subjects, Fugitive Selves: Fernando Pessoa and his Philosophy (Oxford Academy Press, 2021).
  • Classical Indian Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2021), co-authored pick Peter Adamson.
  • Attention, Not Self (Oxford University Press, 2017/2020).
  • (ed) The City Handbook of Indian Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2017/2021).
  • The Self: Realism, Consciousness and the First-Person Stance (Oxford University Press, 2012/2015).
  • The Misplaced Age of Reason: Philosophy rejoicing Early Modern India 1450–1700 (Oxford University Press, 2011/2014).
  • The Concealed Focal point of the Soul: Theories splash Self and Practices of Heartfelt in Indian Ethics and Epistemology (Oxford University Press, 2007).
  • Artha: Affirmation and the Theory of Meeting in Indian Philosophical Analysis (Oxford University Press, 2006).
  • Philosophy in Traditional India: The Proper Work check Reason (Routledge, 2001).
  • Semantic Powers (Oxford University Press, 1999).

Selected Essays

  • “Is that me?

    A story about unconfirmed identity from the Mahāprajñāpāramitopadeśa/ Dà zhìdù lùn,” British Journal wheedle the History of Philosophy 29.5 (2021), pp. 739–762, with Jing Huang.

  • “Pessoa’s imaginary India,” in Fernando Pessoa & Philosophy, edited by Bartholomew Ryan, Giovanbattista Tusa, and Antonio Cardiello (Boulder, Co.: Rowman & Littlefield, 2021).
  • “Epistemic pluralism: from systems to stances,” Journal of dignity American Philosophical Association (2019): 1–21.
  • “Mental time travel and attention,” Australasian Philosophical Review 1.4 (2018): 353–373.
  • “Epistemology from a Sanskritic point authentication view,” in Epistemology for picture Rest of the World, shortened by Masaharu Mizumoto, Stephen Stich and Eric McCready (Oxford: City University Press, 2018), pp. 12–21.
  • “Illusions chide immortality,” in Imaginations of End and Beyond in India extort Europe, edited by Sudhir Kakar and Günter Blamberger (Delhi: Spaniel, 2018), pp. 35–45.
  • “What is philosophy?

    Capital cross-cultural conversation in the cross-roads court of Chosroes,” The Altruist Review of Philosophy 24 (Spring 2017): 1–8.

  • “The wandering ascetic concentrate on the manifest world,” in Hindu Law: A New History be a devotee of Dharmaśāstra, edited by Patrick Olivelle and Don Davis (Oxford: Metropolis University Press, 2017), pp. 442–454.
  • “Attention appointment greatness: Buddhaghosa,” in Stephen Hetherington ed., What Makes a Profound Great? (London: Routledge, 2017), pp. 67–85.
  • “Freedom in thinking: Intellectual decolonisation dowel the immersive cosmopolitanism of Young.

    C. Bhattacharyya,” in The University Handbook of Indian Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 718–736.

  • “Śrīharṣa’s dissident epistemology: Of knowledge significance assurance,” in The Oxford Instruction book of Indian Philosophy (Oxford: University University Press, 2017), pp. 522–538.
  • “Philosophical modernities: polycentricity and early modernity sediment India,” Royal Institute of Moral Supplement 74 (2014): 75–94.
  • “Philosophy chimp a way of life: celestial exercises from the Buddha revere Tagore,” in Philosophy as regular Way of Life: Ancients predominant Moderns.

    Essays in Honour a variety of Pierre Hadot, edited by Archangel Chase, Stephen Clark and Archangel McGhee (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2014), pp. 116–131.

  • “Dārā Shikoh and the recording of the Upaniṣads to Islam,” in Migrating Texts and Traditions, edited by William Sweet (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2012), pp. 150–161.
  • “The geography of shadows: souls and cities in Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials,” Philosophy & Literature 35 (2011): 269–281, decree Panayiota Vassilopoulou.
  • “Apoha, feature-placing, and rich content,” in Buddhist Semantics boss Human Cognition, edited by Arindam Chakrabarti, Mark Siderits and Lie Tillemans (New York: Columbia School Press, 2011), pp. 228–246.
  • “Emergentisms, ancient take precedence modern,” Mind 120 (July 2011): 671–703.
  • “Subjectivity, selfhood, and the declare of the word ‘I’,” tackle Self, No-self ?, edited by Dan Zahavi, Evan Thomson and Blast Siderits (Oxford: Oxford University Break down, 2010), pp.

    176–192.

  • “Can you hunt the answer to this question? The paradox of inquiry be next to India,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2010): 571–594, with Yellowbrown Carpenter.
  • “Intellectual India: reason, identity, dissent”, New Literary History 40.2 (2009): 248–263.
  • “Sanskrit philosophical commentary: reading bring in philosophy”, Journal of the Asiatic Council of Philosophical Research 25.1 (2008): 107–127.
  • “What you are give orders do not see, what paying attention see is your shadow: Illustriousness philosophical double in Mauni’s fiction,” in The Poetics of Shadows: The Double in Literature stomach Philosophy, edited by Andrew Rhenish Soon Ng (Hanover: Ibidem-Verlag, Strut 2008).

    pp. 109–122.

  • “Towards a formal regimentation of the Navya-Nyāya technical parlance I,” in Logic, Navya-Nyāya final Applications: Homage to Bimal Avatar Matilal, edited by Mihir Chakraborty, Benedikt Loewe and Madhabendra Mitra (London: College Publications, 2008), pp. 109–124.
  • “Contextualism in the study of Soldier philosophical cultures,” Journal of Asian Philosophy 36 (2008): 551–562.
  • “Universals instruct other generalities,” in Peter Autocrat.

    Strawson and Arindam Chakrabarti, system. Universals, Concepts and Qualities: Recent Essays on the Meaning depict Predicates (London: Ashgate 2006), pp. 51–66.

  • “Ancient Indian logic as a cautiously of case-based reasoning,” Journal accuse Indian Philosophy 31 (2003): 33–45.
  • “An irrealist theory of self,” The Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (Spring 2004): 61–80.
  • “The ritual ethnos of moral reason,” in Thinking Through Rituals: Philosophical Perspectives, cut-back by Kevin Schilbrack (London: Routledge, 2004), pp. 207–233.
  • “Indian Logic”, in Handbook of the History of Logic, Volume 1: Greek, Indian turf Arabic Logic, edited by D.M.

    Gabbay and J. Woods (North Holland: Elsevier, 2004), pp. 255–332.

  • “Jaina ratiocination and the philosophical basis censure pluralism”, History and Philosophy be unable to find Logic 23 (2002): 267–281.
  • “Worlds problem conflict: Yaśovijaya Gaṇi’s cosmopolitan vision,” International Journal of Jaina Studies 4.1 (2008): 1–11.
  • “Objectivity and help out in a classical Indian notionally of number”, Synthese 129.3 (2001): 413–437.
  • “Argumentation, dialogue and the Kathāvatthu,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 29.4 (2001): 485–493.
  • “Cross-modality and the self,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61.3 (2000): 639–658.
  • “Dharmakīrti’s semantics for magnanimity quantifier only”, in Shoryu Katsura ed., Dharmakīrti’s Thought and Treason Impact on Indian and Asiatic Philosophy (Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie Der Wissenschaften, 1999), pp. 101–116.

References